Who wins idea?

Not sure if this is a good idea or not, or even if this idea is possible or would work. What I propose is as follows;

We get to vote on who has the best RP from the ones that are posted for each match. In order for this to work at all it would mean that people would have to actually keep to the RP deadlines (Monday 23:59 for Warfare / Friday 23.59 for World of Wrestling.) What would then happen is that we get 24 hours to cast a vote for who we feel has the posted the best RP for their match. The voting could either take place on the RP topics themselves, or we could have a separate fed section for it, or it could even be posted on the show card topic. If we each post who we think has the best RP we would all be able to have a say on who has the best. You wouldn't be able to vote for yourself to make it fair, so posting your choice instead of voting on a voting form would be required.

As I said I don't know if this a good idea, but what you guys think about it?

the problem of that idea is that not everyone will be able to vote, and sometimes not all post their rp when they should and sometimes I consider if the rp is better depending on the follow of the storyline, example: Someone do a random rp of him in some other place talking to someone it can be a good rp but it doesn't have to do with anyone or with anything in the fed, but now if he does a rp talking about how renegade to say a name has attacked everyone but is not as good talking about details and so, he too deserve an opportunity to win talking about storyline-wise, and there are a lot of criteria that I consider believe it or not, that's why I feel that the votes will be only like, I read it I like it because is long so I vote his win, do I explain myself?

I did say that for my idea to work everybody would have to adhere to the deadlines for each, I mean if people don't adhere to them now what is the point in having them in the first place? If people were at work or school and had a deadline they would go out of their way to finish it, why should this be any different? If a strict deadline was set and everybody respected that, while anybody that posts their RPs after the deadlines would have their RPs cut from the show. I go out of my way to make sure my RPs are posted on time and if there was a situation where it would be late then I would inform you of that before hand. If you forced everybody to stick to the deadlines then everybody would post on time to make sure their RPs were included.

In regards to the judging RPs you said that the best RP would win, like with Joker his RP was one of the best I have every read, yet if he wrote that and someone else posted a rubbishy RP but includes people in the fed that they would win even though Joker's RP was better? If that's the case then it's not the best RP that wins. I'm pretty sure that everybody has a good sense of what is a good RP and what isn't, people could vote by sending pm's on here or TWG website if they couldn't get on the forum to vote.

To summarise, deadlines and consequences for not posting RPs would have to adhered to and enforced [respectively]. If deadlines are adhered to and RPs posted after the deadline ignored, then people would have plenty of time to vote for the better RPer out of the two who are in a match.

As I said it was only an idea, after all it's your fed your choice.

Nah I didn't mean that, I meant that there are a lot of criteria I analise to choose the winner, and I don't know if everybody will see the same things I see, and I don't make so strict the deadlines, because there are more importan things like "real life" and sometimes is hard to post an rp, and I sometimes take some time to do the match cards and so.

actually Brooklyn, I thought the same thing about the voting on which is the best RP per match and all of that stuff. But in the end, I see it failing, because the voting would never be storyline based. Anyway, on to something different, I want to get into a storyline with you, with PFM's approval of course. Season 2 episode 1, I will talk about things that Renegade did, and one will be when you and I were seemingly attacked. After I talk about how you were attacked to make me win, I want to get into a huge feud with you, where I get the better of you in season 2, but I drop the title to you at the season 3 PPV. I really like your RPs and such, and I like your character. The reason I would keep the title in season 2 would be to strengthen Renegade's stance in the Fed, But during season 3, a few implosions begin, Renegade is losing steam, and, at the very end, I try everything in my power to keep the title, but I lose it anyway. What do you guys think? Yes, I know others may want a title shot and everything, but remember, the main title is always best fought and taken, in a fairly long, developing storyline. And Brooklyn would be perfect.

Okay will leave it there.

Gyalin I copied your idea on a possible feud and quoted it over on my Feud History post in the Feud Discussion topic.